“非虚构写作”在网络舆情事件中的情感动员功能与表达逻辑
更新日期:2021-05-17     浏览次数:134
核心提示:摘要社交媒体时代,舆论生态的“后真相时代”特征日益鲜明,情感与信念成为网络舆情事件的主要动力。“非虚构写作”作为将纪实报道与文学创作结合起来的

摘要 社交媒体时代,舆论生态的“后真相时代”特征日益鲜明,情感与信念成为网络舆情事件的主要动力。“非虚构写作”作为将纪实报道与文学创作结合起来的写作手法,在网络舆情事件中发挥着强大的情感动员功能。通过将悲情叙事、身份标签、戏谑表达等传统的网络情感动员表达逻辑与“文史合一”、忧患意识等“非虚构写作”本土概念巧妙嫁接,“非虚构写作”引发了一系列重大网络舆情事件,呈现出社会学观察、原型叙事、文化冲突三种表达逻辑。“非虚构写作”在舆情表达、舆论监督、社会观察等方面发挥着积极作用。同时,带有深刻情感色彩的“非虚构写作”也蕴含着网络民粹主义、网络暴力、网络虚假信息等诸多风险因素。如何实现“非虚构写作”批判与建设、解构与建构、破与立等方面的平衡,这为互联网生态建设提出了新的内容和新的问题。 In the era of social media,the feature of“post truth era”is being increasingly distinct in public opinion ecology.Emotion and faith have become the main power in network public opinion events.As a writing skill combining documentary coverage with literary creation,“non-fictional writing”has the power of emotional mobilization in network public opinion events.By grafting traditional logic of network emotional mobilization expression like pathetic narration,identity labels,joking expressions into local concept like“integrating literature and history”and hardship consciousness cleverly,“non-fictional writing”has given rise to a series of significant network public opinion events,which expresses three kinds of expression logic:sociological observation,archetypal narration and cultural conflict.“Non-fictional writing”plays an active role in aspects of public opinion expressions,public opinions supervision and social observation.Meanwhile,“non-fictional writing”with deep emotional color also implicates a lot of risk factors,such as network populism,network violence and network false information.How to achieve a balance between criticism and building,deconstruction and construction,abolishment and establishment in“non-fictional writing”brings out new contents and issues in network ecology construction.
作者 董向慧 Dong Xianghui
出处 《理论与改革》 北大核心 2021年第2期125-134,155,156,共12页 Theory and Reform
基金 2018年度天津社会科学院重点课题“社会主要矛盾转化下的网络舆情研究”(18YZD-11)。
关键词 “后真相时代” 非虚构写作 网络舆情 情感动员 舆论监督 网络话语 “Post truth era” Non-fictional writing Network public opinion Emotional mobilization Supervision by public opinion Network discourse