摘要 《数据安全法(草案)》构建了平台数据安全保障义务框架,包含着数据安全制度、个人信息权利保护与监管配合义务三个维度。传统的民事侵权责任理论已经无力解释平台的数据安全保障义务的庞杂体系与多样化内容。应从数据社会生产的角度分析,平台已经成为了数据生产要素提取加工者、数字经济基础设施、数字经济多边市场。根据霍菲尔德的"特权-无权力"框架分析,平台的数据安全保障义务的扩张,实际上是数字经济社会生产中膨胀的平台权力的纠偏机制。合理的平台数据安全保障义务应以数字生产论为基础,合理设置平台对数字产品的质量责任与安全生产义务,划定平台数据安全保障义务的边界,促进数字经济发展。 The Data Security Law establishes a framework for the platform’s data security obligations, including three dimensions: the data security system, the protection of personal information rights, and the obligation to cooperate with supervision. Traditional tort liability theories are no longer able to explain the complex system and diverse content of the platform’s data security obligations. The platform should be analyzed from the perspective of social production of data, which has become adata processor, infrastructure of digital economy, and multilateral market of digital economy. According to Hohfeld’s "privileged-powerless" framework, the expansion of the platform’s data security obligations is actually a corrective mechanism for the platform’s expanding power in the social production of the digital economy. A reasonable platform data security obligation should be based on the theory of data production, reasonably setting up the platform’s responsibility for quality and safety of digital products, and delineating the boundaries of the platform’s data security obligation to promote the development of the digital economy.
机构地区 北京科技大学文法学院
出处 《法学论坛》 北大核心 2021年第2期46-57,共12页 Legal Forum
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目《网络平台监管的算法问责制构建研究》(20BFX151)的阶段性成果
关键词 数据安全法 平台的数据安全保障义务 数据生产要素 数据社会生产 Data Security Law data security obligations of platforms data as productive factor data production
分类号 D922.8 [政治法律—法学]
