摘要 网络舆论“审判”作为一种国家机器缺场下的多元主体网络互动,在法理、舆论传播等论域曾引起广泛关注,但其社会性意蕴尚待进一步探访。结构紧张视阈下,网络舆论“审判”身后实则是一套包蕴利益诉求、公正企盼等合理性需求的建制化逻辑:在转型中国之原子化个体焦虑、制度表达间隙、文化发展滞差等张力格局中,网络舆论“审判”恰适地扮演着网民搭建风险共同体、代偿漂浮性民主、书写泛道德性惯习的社会公器。囿于网络技术所携带的不确定性变量,网络舆论“审判”时常沦为充斥民粹话语、污名符号的暴力展演,甚至震荡出妨碍司法公正、激扰网络社会秩序的风险能量。面向愈发灼人的网络舆论“审判”,唯有构筑起聚合社会共治力量、引导诉求传递的善治桥梁,方能实现消减网络风险矢量、整合社会张力结构的可能。 As a kind of network interaction of multiple subjects in the absence of state apparatus,online public opinion trial has attracted much attention in the fields of jurisprudence and public opinion dissemination,but its social implications are yet to be further explored.In the context of structural tensions,online public opinion judgment is actually a set of establishment logic that embraces rational demands for interests and justice:in the tension pattern of atomized individual anxiety,institutional expression gap,and cultural development lag in transition China,online public opinion judgment appropriately plays the role of a social tool for netizens to build risk communities,compensate for floating democracy,and write pan-moral habits.Due to the uncertainties carried by network technology,online public opinion trials are often reduced to violent performances filled with populist discourse and stigmatizing symbols,and even vibrate with risky energy that obstructs judicial justice and disturbs online social order.Facing the increasingly scorching online public opinion trials,the only way to achieve the possibility of reducing the network risk vector and integrating the social tension structure is to build a bridge of good governance that aggregates the forces of social governance and guides the transmission of demands.
机构地区 华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院
出处 《新疆社会科学》 2021年第1期147-160,170,共15页 Social Sciences in Xinjiang
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“特大城市社会风险系统治理研究”(16ZDA083)、上海市社科规划一般课题“特大城市基层矛盾纠纷化解的社会机制与复合治理研究”(2019BSH003)的阶段性成果。
关键词 网络舆论“审判” 结构紧张 生成机理 网络风险 online public opinion trial structural tension generation mechanism cyber risk
分类号 G206 [文化科学—传播学]
